Walter Prescott, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Walter Prescott, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: No. 71789 Handdown Date: 08/26/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Hon. Lucy D. Rauch Counsel for Appellant: David E. Woods Counsel for Respondent: Joanne E. Joiner Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr., and Karohl, JJ., concur. Opinion:

ORDER Defendant, Walter Edward Prescott, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.