William Maxwell, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: William Maxwell, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent Case Number: 72963 Handdown Date: 07/28/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Kenneth M. Romines Counsel for Appellant: David C. Hemingway Counsel for Respondent: John Munson Morris and Breck K. Burgess Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski, and Gaertner, JJ. Opinion: O R D E R Appellant, William L. Maxwell, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing after he pled guilty to delivery of controlled substance, RSMo section 195.211 (1994). We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.