OTT LAW

Wilma Lee Novak, Respondent, v. Gerald Bernard Novak, Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Wilma Lee Novak, Respondent, v. Gerald Bernard Novak, Appellant. Case Number: 71639 Handdown Date: 10/14/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Gasconade County, Hon. John C. Brackman Counsel for Appellant: Timothy J. Melinbrink Counsel for Respondent: Paula Jean Meyer Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Grimm, P.J.; Pudlowski, and Gaertner, JJ., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Appellant, Gerald Bernard Novak, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Gasconade County dissolving his marriage to respondent, Wilma Lee Novak. Appellant specifically appeals those portions of the trial court's order requiring him to pay respondent modifiable maintenance and a fraction of her attorney's fees. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions