Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable
Missouri Case Party
A.L. Missouri Cases
This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
- Party ID
- al
- Cases Shown
- 3
- Top Practice Route
- Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Cases Involving A.L.
Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.
Respondent
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable
E.M.B., Respondent, vs. A.L., Appellant.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable
In the Interest of: S.K.J., A.L.L., A.L.L., and A.L., Juveniles; and Juvenile Officer vs. A.L.
Father appealed the termination of his parental rights to his three children, which the trial court based on four statutory grounds and a finding that termination was in the children's best interests. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, finding no error in the trial court's decision to terminate parental rights on the "failure to rectify" ground. The court also found that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that termination was in the children's best interests, rejecting Father's claims regarding imputed safety concerns and the "better off in another home" finding.